Moves by legislators and homosexual activists to endorse same sex adoption are misguided.
Their intentions may be good, but they are ignoring the rights of children and important social and psychological research into the homosexual lifestyle.
Both Boards strongly reiterate the Catechism's teaching that people who self-identify as gays and lesbians must be treated with 'respect, compassion, and sensitivity' CCC The Boards also support the Church's right to speak to aspects of this issue in accordance with her own self-understanding.
Articles in this section have been chosen to cast light on how the teachings of the Church intersect with the various social, moral, and legal developments in secular society. CERC will not publish articles which, in the opinion of the editor, expose gays and lesbians to hatred or intolerance.
The recent decision of Catholic Social Services of
Richard 1 homosexual adoption Illinois to separate from the Church and place children in same sex unions occurred after Illinois followed the lead set by other states and enacted legislation to protect so-called rights for homosexual unions. This legislation, the Illinois Religious Freedom Protection and Civil Union Actdenied funding to social service agencies that refuse to permit same sex adoption.
Experimenting on children by permitting adoption by same sex couples poses serious problems. Children have a right to and a need for parenting by both a father and a mother. This need should be recognized by the state and by professional groups as far more important than an adult's supposed right to adopt.
Richard 1 homosexual adoption views presented here are based on extensive social science research and scholarship, on my clinical experience as a psychiatrist that includes consulting with adoptive and foster children for several years, treating adoptive children for almost 35 years, writing about their treatment in a textbook for the American Psychological Association  and as the father of three adopted daughters.
Same sex relationships do not provide an ideal environment in which to raise children for several reasons. First, same sex couples tend to be promiscuous. One of the largest studies of same sex couples revealed that only seven of couples had a sexual relationship which was totally monogamous.
Most of these relationships lasted less than five years. Couples whose relationship lasted longer incorporated some provision for outside sexual activity: Second, the unions are very fragile. The probability of breakup is high for lesbian couples. In a report, the US National Longitudinal Lesbian Family Study40 percent of the couples who had conceived a child by artificial insemination had broken up.
The women who kept Richard 1 homosexual adoption same identity for the whole ten years proved to be the smallest and most atypical group.
And third, the couple may not necessarily be physically healthy. Dutch research has found that most new HIV infections in Amsterdam occurred among homosexual men who were in steady relationships. The researcher concluded that: The most important issue
Richard 1 homosexual adoption the welfare of the child.
Social science research has repeatedly demonstrated the vital importance of both a father and a mother for the healthy development of children and the serious risks that they face if they are raised without a mother or a father.
Mothers and fathers bring unique gifts that are essential to the health of a child. Among the many distinctive talents that mothers bring to the parenting enterprise, three stand out: Social science studies confirm this. Numerous reports indicate that infants and toddlers prefer mothers to fathers when they are hungry, afraid or sick.
Mothers tend to be more soothing. Mothers are more responsive to the distinctive cries of infants; they are better able than fathers, for instance, to distinguish between a cry of hunger and a cry of They are also better than fathers at detecting the emotions of their children by looking at their faces, postures, and gestures.
Children who were deprived of maternal care during extended periods in their early lives "lacked feeling, had superficial relationships, and exhibited hostile or Richard 1 homosexual adoption tendencies" as they developed into adulthood. All cultures recognize the essential role of the mother. Fathers also have distinctive talents. They also provide essential role models for boys.
Their presence in the home protects a child from fear and strengthens a child's ability to feel safe. The extensive research on the serious psychological, academic and social problems among youth raised in fatherless families demonstrates the importance of the presence of the father in the home for healthy child development. The rights and needs of children to a mother and a father should be protected by the state.
Adults do not have a right to deprive children of a father or a mother. There are strong indications that children raised by same sex couples fare less well than children raised in stable homes with a mother and a father.
In a well-designed study of primary school children in Australia 58 children in married "Richard 1 homosexual adoption," 58 in families headed by cohabitating heterosexuals and 58 in home with homosexual unions suggested that married couples offered the best environment for a child's social and education environment.
Cohabiting couples were second best and homosexual couples came last. Researchers interviewed 68 women with gay or bisexual fathers and 68 women with heterosexual fathers.
The women average age 29 in both groups with gay
Richard 1 homosexual adoption bisexual fathers had difficulty with adult attachment issues in three areas: Not surprisingly, there are scholars who oppose this weighty evidence. Two major studies published in are often cited by homosexual activists and the media.
Nanette Gartrell and Henry Bos  and Timothy Biblarz and Judith Stacey  claim that children who were deliberately deprived of the benefits of gender complementarity in a home with a father and a mother suffer no psychological damage. However, all data in the Gartell and Bos article are self-reports by the mother and the child.
The mothers were aware of the political agenda of the research and this must have skewed the results. This defect in methodology severely weakens the report. In the meta-study by Biblarz and Stacey, in 31 of Richard 1 homosexual adoption 33 studies of two parent families, it was the parents who provided the data, which consisted of subjective judgments.
Once again, this created a social desirability bias because the homosexual parents knew the political agenda behind the study. Furthermore, of the 33 studies in two-person families, only two studies included men, although the title, "How does the gender of parents matter? Much of the research on same-sex couples tends to have serious methodological flaws. It is often argued that there is no evidence that children are harmed if they are raised by homosexual men.
This is true, but the absence of evidence does not prove the case. It means that there is no evidence. Studies of children raised by homosexual men are rare. No studies have examined the long-term effects on adult males raised by homosexual men. Richard 1 homosexual adoption adopted child has been separated from his or her biological parents. The child feels this loss.
For this reason adoption agencies historically have sought the best possible placement a sensitive and stable father and mother. A same-sex couple is by definition a second-class placement, since a parent of the opposite sex is missing.